![]() ![]() There are advantages and disadvantages for both, beyond the size difference, but in the end both can deliver fantastic shots of similar subjects (except tele). Other than that, Canon is great, but I get the same quality shots with my E-M5. Over the years I upgraded my MFT system (started with a GF1) and sold a lot of my Canon glass. The only reason the 7D is not yet on ebay is the fact that I like tele photography, and MFT is no match for Canon in both cameras and lenses in that area. I thought that the D7000 was an APSC too ? The main point is that a new Sony MFT sensor would yield better results than the Canon Rebels (aka the xxxD, I picked the 650D because there are not yet test results for the 700D, but I believe that the 700D didn't get a new sensor. ![]() I wasn't trying to list any Nikon cameras for the good reason that I'm not a Nikon user and don't know them. You need at least a FF or a Nikon camera like the D7000 to get better results.Īccording to DXO my D5100 has a better sensor than the EM5 If you get a camera with one of the last Sony sensor, they will be better than the Canon Rebels APSC sensor just look at the DXO test results here. Think lenses and just get the body that makes the best sense to use them on. The cameras are OK, but I still have a DSLR to do what they cannot do or don't do very well. The reason for owning the E-PL5 is to make use of the small and lightweight lenses. No m43 camera can do this (except possibly the GH3 perhaps) DSLRs still have advantages in overall capability. It also can sit on a tripod for days waiting for a remote trigger with virtually no battery drain. The D7000 AF is far far better at tracking moving subjects. Image quality (colour depth, dynamic range, snr etc) is not the main differentiator though. (That's shooting raw - not taking into account any vagaries of the jpeg ISO 1600 the D7000 is better in large prints but for an 8x10 print or an HD screen the difference is not visible. I am presently shooting with a 50D as my primary camera.Į-PL5 (same sensor as E-M5) vs Nikon D7000 - both 16 ISO 200 any difference in image quality is insignificant in prints or normal viewing. I really would like to go MFT, but do not want to give up quality. True, I am viewing on a standard screen and looking at images, many of which have been manipulated, but I am feeling that the MFT shots in general do not have the depth of color and fullness of the larger sensor cameras. Has anyone shot a test under controlled conditions facing the EM5's sensor against an SLR sensor, say APS-C (x1.6) from a Canon Rebel. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |